My Chumby Just Arrived
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2008/01/07
My Chumby just arrived — here it is (except mine is black) — and yes, this is a realtime reflection of what it is showing –
Frozen moments in an age of technological wonder
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2007/04/17
There are moments that, ages from now, you will remember exactly where you were at when you heard the news.
Like last night.
I was driving back to my hotel in Palo Alto from the Web 2.0 Expo at San Francisco’s Moscone Center West. I turned on the alternative station and heard Loveline come on with Dr. Drew.
I could tell something was different as they started the show — there was a quick note that they had rescheduled the guests for the evening (two porn actresses) and were going to take calls about the Virginia Tech shooting.
What ‘Virginia Tech Shooting?’ I asked myself.
I listened for a few minutes. Not much info. I scanned the FM stations. Nothing there but entertainment. I switched to AM and moved from news site to news site, picking up details.
What a sad moment.
This AM as I listened to CNN while getting ready to head back to the conference, I heard an account from a professor in the building where most of the murders occurred.
He described hearing gunshots and barricading himself into his office. He detailed how he went to watch video on CNN’s web site to get an idea of what was happening around him.
And I am at one of the biggest tech conferences to ever focus on how we, as an industry, create things like streaming media tools, etc. — and how they might be used.
I honestly never imagined that one — streaming video to monitor a massacre in your immediate proximity.
Stranger still is the fact that, after the Dot Com Crash, I worked at Real Networks for a year — monitoring the live performance of those CNN feeds — rallying the troops when surges brought things to a halt — triaging the system when it all went to hell.
I was the guy who woke up the Real news chief when the space shuttle broke up on re-entry in 2003. The team I was on monitored the video readiness as the U.S. prepared to invade Iraq and the fall(?) of Bagdad.
Sigh — may you live in interesting times is both a blessing and a curse.
Web 2.0 Expo Target Sessions for Monday
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2007/04/16
Here’s the sessions I’m scoping out for Monday at the Web 2.0 expo –
- Monday 9:00 - The People Formerly Known as the Audience - Derek Powazek, Heather Champ
- Monday 10:10 -Rich Internet Applications with Apollo - Mike Chambers (Adobe)
- Monday 11:15 - Open Source Business Models for Web 2.0 - John Roberts (SugarCRM), Mårten Mickos (MySQL AB)
- Monday 1:30 - Venture Capital 2.0: Bright Future or Broken Forever? - Michael Arrington (TechCrunch), Jeff Clavier, (SoftTech), Michael Eisenberg (Benchmark Capital) David Hornik (August Capital), Josh Kopelman (First Round Capital), Chris Moore (Redpoint Ventures)
- Monday 2:45 - Keynotes with Tim O’Reilly, Jeff Bezos, Mena Trott, Joe Kraus, John Battelle, Jay Adelson, Kevin Lynch, David Knight, Jay Bhatti, and Kerry Fleming
- Monday 5:30 - Expo Hall Booth Crawl
- Monday 8:30 PM - Birds of a Feather Sessions (BoFs) - Measuring the Business Value of Rich Internet Applications - Andre Charland (Nitobi), Ryan Stewart (ZDNet)
Web 2.0 Expo Notes: Building Social Applications
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2007/04/16
I really enjoyed Stowe Boyd’s 3 hour workshop at the Web 2.0 Expo yesterday AM on ‘Building Social Applications‘.
He really helped me get my head around some of the foundations of designing these next generation online social experiences.
Highlights quotes were:
- “Social apps is the world that IM has made”
- “I am made greater by the sum of my connections, and so are my connections”
- “I give up personal productivity for network productivity. I sacrifice for the group.”
- “Fashionista recommendation is a different UI than a feature lookup (size, color, etc)”
- “What happens when the money gets serious? Well, what happened to the blogs? TechCrunch is no longer a blog per-se, it is a media property.”
- “Reputation is fragile both online and offline. Squander your rep and CBS may fire you.”
- “I often play psychologist for social apps. I set them on the couch and ask about their childhood.”
- “Find people who tag items the same way you do and you will find a social group based on shared ways of thinking and speaking.”
- “To understand social apps, you have to be in the flow, not outside. You can’t get it unless you are using them and you can’t explain it to people — you’ve got to do it. You can’t learn Karate by thinking about it”
Took notes in MindManger — here’s the .PDF or the .MMAP files.
Have arrived at Web 2.0 Expo
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2007/04/15
I am at the Web 2.0 Expo at Moscone West in San Francisco this AM. Got here early to scope out the power and do a Sightspeed video call with Jen, Thomas, and Ruthie back in Seattle.
If you are here for the conference, shoot me a note or twitter me (bryanzug) and let’s hang out.
Am looking forward to Stowe Boyd’s 3 hour workshop this AM on ‘Building Social Applications‘. I hear he know his $#!7.
Also — the first Ignite session outside of Seattle is happening tonight at the Expo. Brady has put together an excellent lineup — including Justin.tv — should be interesting.
Creating Passionate Users: Face-to-Face Trumps Twitter, Blogs, Podcasts, Video…
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2007/03/16
God bless Kathy Sierra.
Over the last few months I’ve found myself trying to explain the deepening (and real community) aspects of meatspace interactions that my wife Jen and I have been drawn into as a result of participating in online community.
Usually we are trying to explain to business colleagues or friends or family or members of our church that, yes, indeed — online community is a part of real community and not the equivalent of social cheese-whiz that some describe it to be.
But, yeah — as I’m working to explain it I often see eyes begin to glaze over — and I can tell that folks are either not buying it or I’m not communicating very well.
Which leaves me — searching for ways to compellingly relate how online community has become real community for us — looking for the stories and patterns that engage both the emotion and the intellect.
Enter Kathy Sierra.
This morning I read her post from yesterday describing her keynote at SXSW. The post is called Face-to-Face Trumps Twitter, Blogs, Podcasts, Video… and is full of great passages on how all this social web software drives a deeper desire for face-to-face community.
My favorite quote –
…all our globally-connecting-social-networking tools are making face-to-face more, not less desirable. Thanks to the tools y’all are building, we now have more far-flung friends–including people we’ve never met f2f–than ever before. We now have more people we want to connect with in the human world, often after years of electronic-only contact.
Nice insight — sticking that pattern in my bag of tricks — something tells me the “online community isn’t real community, is it?” questions aren’t gonna stop anytime soon — this stuff is continuing to disrupt everything.
Did I mention that my mom who just got her first computer for Christmas is now IM’ing all the time — the world really is getting flat.
Udell on ‘Video Knowledge’ and my riff on the death of the specialist
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2006/12/20
Father of screencasting, Jon Udell has great post on the move toward video as a knowledge/rapid-documentation repository. After a few technical points, he hits this gem that completely jives with my experience on getting into the flow of screencasting –
…you have to overcome the same natural reticence that makes dictation such an awkward process for those of us who haven’t formerly incorporated it into our work style. You also have to overcome the notion, which we unconsciously absorb from our entertainment-oriented culture, that video is a form of entertainment. It can be. Depending on the producer, a screencast documenting a disaster recovery scenario could be side-splittingly funny. And if the humor didn’t compromise the message, a funny version would be much more effective than a dry recitation. But even a dry recitation is way, way better than what’s typically available: nothing.
Just another step toward the seamlessness of media where real headway means that this will be less and less of a specialist skill — who is a ‘word processing’ specialist these days?
No one — every one.
There is a point in the future (near? mid? far?) Jon alludes to here where things like screencasting will be a natural repository for business/education/whatever knowledge — a time when this stuff will not be a specialized skillset.
Last night with the wife and kids, I brought YouTube up on the family TV and searched for my wife’s username and my daughter’s name. We all sat mesmerized for 30 minutes while we played the various clips Jen has uploaded over the past 6-8 months.
It’s content that I, as a professional multimedia producer, had little to do with — All video my wife produced on her own through mostly self developed knowledge and a digital camera (not a miniDV camcorder).
What does TV look like to my daughter and my wife? Something much less specialized than I could ever imagine — and I’ve got a good imagination.
On with the flattening of the universe…
Less about eYada and more about participatory cultures
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2006/11/08
Tama points out a couple of reports this morning on technology and learning that focus less on the tools and more on how they enable folks to engage in participatory cultures.
From Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century by Henry Jenkins and the MacArthur Foundation –
That is why we focus in this paper on the concept of participatory cultures rather than on interactive technologies. Interactivity is a property of the technology, while participation is a property of culture. Participatory culture is emerging as the culture absorbs and responds to the explosion of new media technologies that make it possible for average consumers to archive, annotate, appropriate, and recirculate media content in powerful new ways. A focus on expanding access to new technologies carries us only so far if we do not also foster the skills and cultural knowledge necessary to deploy those tools toward our own ends.
That seems like a really compelling way to describe all this eLearning 2.0 stuff to me.
Blog or Project Log: Selling disruptive tools on the inside
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2006/08/24
Jay Cross has a great post this AM about the need to find compelling language that can drive experimentation and adoption of blog, podcast, and wiki types of tools inside of organizations ––
It’s time for us to come up with a vocabulary that’s not an obstacle to installing learning technology. Take the word blog. For some people, the word sets off alarm bells. They envision amateurs, threatening hackers, neo-nazis, the Drudge Report, people obsessed with kittens, semi-literates, unverifiable nonsense, spammers, porno freaks, political extremists, teen age confessionals, MySpace flirts, people who are out of control and lawsuits waiting to happen.
It’s enough to give disruptive technology a bad name.
So let’s not speak of blogs or slimeheads. Let’s talk about Project Logs. Or Collaborative Project Documentation. Or Knowledge Logs. Or professional journals.
<bagoftricks>Project log –– hmm, that could work.</bagoftricks>
Current style in web design
Posted by Bryan Zug - 2006/08/17
Web Design from Scratch has a nice rundown of current wed design trends and why they are effective. Nice roundup of examples.
I’m glad to say that web design in 2006 is better than ever. And it’s not just because there are more web sites out there, so more good stuff to look at. There’s still an awful lot of crud too. I just think that more web designers know more about how to design than ever before.
The examples below (which I’ll roll over time) show excellent modern graphic design technique. They all look good, and are clear and easy to use.
Powered by WordPress with GimpStyle Theme design by Horacio Bella.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS.


