<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Made to Stick&#8217; Cover Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zug.flathatter.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zug.flathatter.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/</link>
	<description>Bryan Zug's blog on interactive development and the art of thriving in a world of change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:08:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://zug.flathatter.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/comment-page-1/#comment-16982</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearningskinny.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/#comment-16982</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a university prof myself and couldn&#039;t agree more.  As faculty, are we interested in how much we teach or how much students LEARN.  For me, it&#039;s about learning, and so making sure that there&#039;s a &quot;sticky&quot; side to knowledge is vital--a core competency--to being an educator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a university prof myself and couldn&#8217;t agree more.  As faculty, are we interested in how much we teach or how much students LEARN.  For me, it&#8217;s about learning, and so making sure that there&#8217;s a &#8220;sticky&#8221; side to knowledge is vital&#8211;a core competency&#8211;to being an educator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Zug</title>
		<link>http://zug.flathatter.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7112</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Zug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearningskinny.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/#comment-7112</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;
I’M HELPING MY CLIENT UNDERSTAND.
&gt;&gt;

exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>><br />
  I’M HELPING MY CLIENT UNDERSTAND.<br />
  ></p>
</blockquote>
<p>exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://zug.flathatter.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elearningskinny.com/made-to-stick-cover-design/#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...
as a technology consultant I consider myself to be an educator of sorts.  Again and again I discuss with my mentors and peers this concept of stickiness (we use the term &quot;getting the client to the spot&quot;).  Every phone call, meeting, email, status report, etc. with a client (the list inlcudes Microsoft and other enterprise level companies) is considered a prescious moment in time, which can never be recaptured, and every situation is an opportunity to get to the spot.  The spot may be: understanding the ramifications (schedule/cost) of changing some functional requirement, or helping to understand the reasons for the selected technology to implement a business solution.

My clients are typically double/triple booked, with large simultaneous intiatives.  I&#039;m convinced I only have 3/4 sentences to get them there, and I use a variety of tools depending on my need.  They include: pictures with Visio, tables in Word, a spoken metaphor, a working prototype.  Hell, if the needs change in the middle of a meeting, I&#039;ll scratch a workflow diagram on a napkin with the best of them.  Regardless, I&#039;m not entertaining with pretty pictures - I&#039;M HELPING MY CLIENT UNDERSTAND.  

Should they be punished by pithy explanations because I can&#039;t communicate the point concisely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;<br />
as a technology consultant I consider myself to be an educator of sorts.  Again and again I discuss with my mentors and peers this concept of stickiness (we use the term &#8220;getting the client to the spot&#8221;).  Every phone call, meeting, email, status report, etc. with a client (the list inlcudes Microsoft and other enterprise level companies) is considered a prescious moment in time, which can never be recaptured, and every situation is an opportunity to get to the spot.  The spot may be: understanding the ramifications (schedule/cost) of changing some functional requirement, or helping to understand the reasons for the selected technology to implement a business solution.</p>
<p>My clients are typically double/triple booked, with large simultaneous intiatives.  I&#8217;m convinced I only have 3/4 sentences to get them there, and I use a variety of tools depending on my need.  They include: pictures with Visio, tables in Word, a spoken metaphor, a working prototype.  Hell, if the needs change in the middle of a meeting, I&#8217;ll scratch a workflow diagram on a napkin with the best of them.  Regardless, I&#8217;m not entertaining with pretty pictures &#8211; I&#8217;M HELPING MY CLIENT UNDERSTAND.  </p>
<p>Should they be punished by pithy explanations because I can&#8217;t communicate the point concisely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
